Social Dysfunction: Evil and the Perception of STDs
House 29 © 2014 XJ Corps
by XJ Randall
Sunday 14 June 2015
times I hear what people say. I hear the ideas that concern what people
say, and I notice that sometimes the logic that created those ideas is
flawed. When it comes to understanding diseases and 'supposed' disorders
and the popular connotation or view of them, it seems that the dogma in
their sphere of influence needs to be altered or corrected. This would
apparently be true in the mental health and health 'industries' of the
United States. In this brief explanation, I intend to address and
correct a certain category of this argument, a social stigma known as,
"sexually transmitted diseases", or 'STDs'.
has shown a pattern and inequality that will lead to innovation. A
brief and logical analysis of the current situation, from our past,
allows an educated and open minded individual to argue that a (or 'the')
sexual stigma exists because of and for 'illicit' purposes: a power and
control complex that is rooted in the nature and/or 'spirit' of evil.
Because it is what one does that defines who they are and sometimes who
they are is what defines the nature of the definition.
is a seemingly harmless remark, simply because it was done in vain. It
counters health, or goodness, which refers to the way we are able to
heal ourselves or adapt after 'anti-survival'. A large part of the
populous behave in a fashion that is not ethically or morally healthy
for the social status of the United States. The underlying problem that
we deal with is not the physical disorder(s). It is not AIDS, HIV,
HERPES, or any other sexually transmitted disease. These are symptoms of
the actual disorder, a sexual dysfunction existing beneath the surface
of societal activity that affects everything above it. This implies that
the root of the symptom is a disorder of a corrupt and immaterial
Thus, an immaterial problem requires an
immaterial solution. We start by getting to the root. In order to cure
an acne, a cancer, we change our diet, our 'blood chemistry'. In order
to change a bad habit, we change our thought process. We perceive a
situation in a different way. We change our social mind.
the day we are born we begin to die. This 'transition' is likely the
most infamous inevitability that we cannot escape. It is appropriate to
blame a person for killing with a weapon. It is appropriate to charge
that person with a grievance. But to blame a person, to be evil to a
person for the inevitability that is not in their control is not
appropriate, not right, and not even logical. Evil was not created by
man. It was found by man and used by man to control man. And man using
evil must not know that Evil is the one using man.
you ask me in person, I will tell you what I know to be true in my
heart. In this paper, I decline to explain what I mean when I say that
the United States is "gravely disabled" when it comes to correcting the
'homosexual-evil' pervading the weapon that is the broadcasting media.
However, people are people, and as people, according to law, they have
the right to pursue happiness. Honestly, sex is like any other pursuit
and in action is like any other happiness. People should not be tortured
for an evil they did not create just because they chose to fulfill
their right to pursue that happiness. I think it is easy to understand
what I mean when I say this.
To behave evil is to be
evil itself. In solution, we should know that just because one has a
disease, regardless of what type or kind of disease it is, it is not the
disease that makes that person evil. His or her actions are what should
be accounted for and our actions should be based off of this truth.
Consequently, the only disorder or disease we should fear is evil
John Edward Hall
313 Perrin Avenue #3
Lafayette, IN 47904